Skip to main content
The Ultrasound Journal
Download PDF

Mean value of B-mode optic nerve sheath diameter as an indicator of increased intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The Ultrasound Journal volume 13, Article number: 35 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Objectives

Timely diagnosis and treatment of increased intracranial pressure can decrease morbidity and prevent mortality. The present meta-analysis aims to determine the mean value of the ONSD measured in patients with various elevated ICP etiologies under different clinical settings, as well as comparing the value of ONSD between patients with and without elevated ICP.

Methods

This meta-analysis complied with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Statement8. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify ONSD measured by US for patients with increased ICP from establishment to October 2020.

Results

A total of 779 patients with elevated ICP among 22 studies were included in the present meta-analysis. Studies were published between 2003 and 2020. Eighteen were comparative (18/22, 81.8%), and four were single-armed study (4/22, 18.2%). Twenty were prospective studies (20/22, 90.9%). There was moderate-to-high heterogeneity based on the prediction ellipse area and variance logit of sensitivity and specificity.

Conclusions

The mean value of the ONSD among patients diagnosed with increased ICP was 5.82 mm (95% CI 5.58–6.06 mm). Variations were observed based on etiology of intracranial hypertension, clinical settings where ONSD was measured, and standards for diagnosing intracranial hypertension. The US-ONSD among patient with elevated ICP was significantly higher than the normal control. Although a cut-off value is not clearly determined, these mean values can be implemented to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of US-ONSD in diagnosing intracranial hypertension in future studies.

Introduction

Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) can arise from a variety of cerebral conditions such as stroke, bleeding, malignancy, and trauma [1]. Timely diagnosis and treatment of elevated ICP could prevent detrimental consequences such herniation and decrease mortality [2, 3]. Although invasive intracranial monitoring has been regarded the “gold-standard”, it demands neurosurgical expertise and is associated with post-procedural complications including infection, hemorrhage, and misplacement [4]. Signs of elevated ICP could manifest as effacement of ventricles and midline shift on CT and MRI [5], but these imaging modalities are not always available in all medical environment and require time for transfer. Within the last two decades, evidence has proven ultrasound (US) measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) to be a surrogate for intracranial pressure, a point-of-care procedure that can be conveniently done at bedside [6, 7]. Increased ONSD has been noted in patients with elevated ICP of various etiologies in ICU, clinic, and emergency departments. Despite the currently available literature, there is no consensus regarding the cut-off of ONSD for elevated ICP. The present meta-analysis aims to determine the ONSD measured in patients with various elevated ICP etiologies under different clinical settings, as well as comparing the value of ONSD between patients with and without elevated ICP.

Materials and methods

Literature search

This meta-analysis complied with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Statement [8]. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify ONSD measured by US for patients with increased ICP from establishment to October 2020. The following keywords were used: “optic nerve sheath diameter”, “ultrasound”, “intracranial”, “pressure”, and “hypertension”.

Inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria

The following inclusion criteria were adopted: (a) patients who underwent US measurement of ONSD; (b) patients with elevated ICP; (c) ONSD must be reported in mean and standard deviation on US; (d) confirmation of elevated ICP must be done in another modality other than ultrasound and clinical exam such as CT, MRI, lumbar puncture (LP), and invasive intracranial monitoring. A study was excluded if any of the following criteria were met: (a) non-clinical studies; (b) sample size less than 6; (c) case-reports; (d) pediatric and animal population, and (e) irrelevant studies that did not focus on the topic of using US to measure ONSD of patients with intracranial HTN.

Endnote X8 (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvanian) was used to identify duplicates. Titles, abstracts, and key words were screened, followed by the review of full texts of the remaining studies.

Data collection and statistical analysis

Baseline characteristics were extracted from each study including author, year of publication, country, study design, sample size, “gold-standard” of increased ICP, optic nerve diameter measured by US, hospital setting, etiology of increased ICP. “Gold-standard” is defined as increased ICP confirmed by CT, MRI, lumbar puncture (LP), or invasive intracranial monitoring. Optic nerve diameter was only included if reported in mean and standard deviation. Two researchers extracted the data from the original studies, and any disagreement was resolved through review and discussion.

Quantitative analysis was performed with Stata 15.1 (STATA Corp., College Station, TX, USA). Meta-analysis was conducted with the -metan function. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistics. A random-effect model was used for a more conservative estimation due to the quality of included studies. Optic nerve diameters were pooled if reported by original articles. Subgroup analysis was made based on hospital settings, etiology of increased ICP, and “gold-standard” of ICP measurement. Comparison of the increased ICP and normal ICP groups was performed via standard mean difference (SMD) by including comparative studies. Funnel plot and Egger’s tests were implemented to assess publication bias.

Results

Baseline characteristics

Among the initial 497 unique search results (Fig. 1), a total of 779 patients with elevated ICP among 22 studies were included in the present meta-analysis. Studies were published between 2003 and 2020. Eighteen were comparative (18/22, 81.8%), and four were single-armed study (4/22, 18.2%). Twenty were prospective studies (20/22, 90.9%). Studies were performed in USA (n = 3), China (n = 3), India (n = 3), Italy (n = 2), Turkey (n = 1), Thailand (n = 1), Spain (n = 1), Saudi Arabia (n = 1), Pakistan (n = 1), Nigeria (n = 1), Iraq (n = 1), Finland (n = 1), and France (n = 1). The brand of US machine implemented by each study is listed in Table 1. All studies measured ONSD at 3 mm posterior to the globe, with varying transverse and/or sagittal measurements and repetition times (Table 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow-diagram of manuscript screening and selection

Full size image
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of included studies
Full size table

ONSD measured by ultrasound

Based on 743 patients from 22 studies with elevated ICP, the overall pooled ONSD measured by ultrasound was 5.82 mm (95% CI 5.58–6.06). Based on etiology of increased ICP, patients who had trauma, hydrocephalus, and pseudotumor cerebri had ONSD of 6.12 (95% CI 5.88–6.35) mm, 5.80 (95% CI 5.64–5.96) mm, and 6.62 (95% CI 6.45–6.79) mm, respectively. By hospital settings, US ONSD that were measured in the ICU, ED, clinic, and OR had a diameter of 6.25 (95% CI 5.92–6.57) mm, 5.72 (95%CI 5.24–6.19) mm, 5.66 (95%CI 5.60–5.71) mm, and 5.80 (95% CI 5.64–5.96) mm, respectively. According to the diagnosis of increased ICP, patients who were diagnosed by CT, MRI, LP, and invasive intracranial monitoring had ONSD on US of 5.67 (95% CI 5.44–5.91) mm, 5.43 (95% CI 5.25–5.61) mm, 5.75 (95% CI 5.09–6.40) mm, and 6.04 (95% CI 5.76–6.32) mm, respectively.

ONSD between patients with increased ICP and the normal cohort

Among 15 comparative studies, 463 and 609 patients had elevated and normal ICP, respectively. The ONSD measured by US was significantly larger among patients with elevated ICP compared to their normal counterparts (5.6 mm vs 4.1 mm, SMD: 2.44 [95% CI 1.93–2.95]). Similar findings were seen in each subgroup stratified based on gold-standard diagnosis modalities (CT, LP and invasive monitoring). Funnel plot did not show significant asymmetry (Egger’s test: p = 0.145).

Discussion

The use of ultrasound in the hospital setting has increased drastically in recent years due to multiple factors such as advancements of technology, minimal invasiveness, affordability, ease of use, and increased access to providers [31,32,33,34,35,36,37]. Ultrasound is a valuable tool due to its ability to identify or rule-out certain pathologies quickly and efficiently [31,32,33,34]. As a result, it has been used in combination with gold standard techniques, which are oftentimes more invasive and require extended time.

The gold standard method to measure intracranial pressure (ICP) is intracranial monitoring with an intraventricular catheter, which typically requires an intraparenchymal catheter to be passed through a cranial burr hole into the ventricle. However, this test has multiple downsides even though it can determine the most accurate value [4, 38], including complications such as infection, post-procedural hemorrhage (due to device placement), parenchymal destruction, and misplacement in addition to other factors such as increased time for device placement and requirement for skilled in-house personnel, typically neurosurgeons [4]. Other less invasive tests that can identify increased ICP include radiological means such as CT and MRI, transcranial Doppler, ophthalmoscopy, tympanic displacement, and optic nerve sheath diameter [38]. As a result, these less invasive tests, especially those involving ultrasound, are frequently used as adjuncts or alternatives to more invasive monitoring. Recently, the use of optic nerve ultrasound as a noninvasive, accurate, safe, reproducible, and cost-effective tool for ICP via the measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) has been validated, thereby decreasing the potentially detrimental consequences of invasive transcranial measurements [6, 9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30].

The anatomical relationship between the optic nerve and subarachnoid space results in an expansion of the optic nerve sheath in states of increased intracranial pressure [9, 12]. Thus, optic nerve sheath diameter can provide information regarding ICP. Ultrasound enables a noninvasive measurement to be taken 3 mm behind the globe, in a retro bulbar position, with a high frequency linear ultrasound probe, which allows for appropriate contrast between the optic nerve and retro bulbar fat to ensure accurate reference points [9, 12, 16]. Normally, three measures for each eye are taken and then averaged. Based on comparative studies, the US-ONSD among patients with elevated ICP was significantly greater than their normal ICP counterparts (Fig. 2A).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measured by ultrasound (US) between patients with elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) and normal cohort (A). Funnel plot and Egger’s test evaluating publication bias (B)

Full size image

Nonetheless, the definitive mean value for ONSD in states of increased ICP has been a point of contention and controversy for many years due lack of meta-analysis and the inability to place an intracranial monitor in all patients where ICP is monitored to correlate this measurements in a more reliable way, though this value approximately lies between 5 and 6 mm based on prior literature [6, 9, 11, 16,17,18, 20,21,22,23,24, 26, 28]. In order to narrow this range to a more specific value, the present meta-analysis increases the power of the study by pooling available evidence in the literature. According to 22 unique studies over the past 17 years, the overall pooled ONSD measured by ultrasound was found to be 5.82 (95% CI 5.58–6.06) mm, consistent with previously reported MRI measurements (5.81–5.82 mm) [31, 32]. Subtle variations in mean values may be attributed to study site variation in diagnostic control (i.e., CT vs. MRI vs. LP vs. ICP monitor), patient variation such as anatomical differences or severity of illness (i.e., ICU status, etc.), and user variation such as ultrasound probe placement, reference points used for measurements, and the inter equipment variation related with ultrasound devices themselves (i.e., probe frequency, image quality, etc.). Widespread training in this practice is expected to increase precision and accuracy of measurements, and thus sensitivity and specificity of the exam findings.

Due to the easy accessibility of US compared to other imaging modality such as CT and MRI, it can be implemented by physicians in a variety of clinical settings, such as the ED, OR, ICU, clinic, wards, etc. (Table 1). US-ONSD measured in ICU patients demonstrated the largest value 6.25 (95% CI 5.92–6.57) mm (Fig. 3), reflecting the critically ill nature of this patient population and higher ICP requiring ICU care. Because the use of US is operator-dependent, the accuracy and precision of US-ONSD can be influenced by type of clinical setting where measurement takes place. For instance, measuring US-ONSD in a busy ED can be more technically challenging compared to in a controlled environment such as OR or ICU where patients are sedated. Further matched-comparative studies are warranted to compare its use in different clinical settings.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measured by ultrasound (US) stratified by clinical settings where measurement was taken place. ICU Intensive care unit, ED Emergency Department, OR operating room

Full size image

Previous studies indicated a strong correlation between increased ONSD and radiologic findings with CT and MRI [6, 9, 39, 40]. Patients diagnosed with increased ICP by CT or MRI had lower ONSDs on ultrasound (5.67 mm; 95% CI 5.44–5.91 mm and 5.43 mm; 95% CI 5.25–5.61 mm) than patients diagnosed with invasive ICP monitoring (6.04 mm; 95% CI 5.76–6.32 mm). Brain Trauma Foundation recommends considering invasive ICP monitoring under the setting of severe head injury [41]; the longer pooled ONSD of these patients in the present meta-analysis might be related to the severity of increased ICP prompted invasive monitoring.

The present meta-analysis also found variations of ONSD among different etiologies of intracranial hypertension (Fig. 4), though there were only three study dedicated to IIT and one focusing on hydrocephalus. Compared to hydrocephalus, values for traumatic etiologies were greater than hydrocephalus (6.12 [95%CI 5.88–6.35] vs 5.8 [95%CI 5.64–5.96] mm), which may be explained by the rapid increase in ICP due to mass effect from head injury. However, the pooled pressure of idiopathic intracranial hypertension was the highest (6.62 [95%CI 6.45–6.79)] mm), which is possibly due to chronic change. Such observation could be affected by the etiology of the disease. Based on the modified Dandy criteria, papilledema is one criterion of diagnosing idiopathic intracranial hypertension [42]. Because papilledema is optic disc edema resulted from elevated ICP transmitted through optic nerve sheath [43], increase of ONSD should takes precedence prior to the development of papilledema. Because of under powering of the number of included studies, these speculation warrants further research (Fig. 5).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measured by ultrasound (US) stratified by the diagnostic method of increased intracranial pressure (ICP). MRI magnetic resonance imaging, CT computed tomography, LP lumbar puncture, Inv invasive intracranial monitoring

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measured by ultrasound (US) stratified by etiology of elevated intracranial pressure

Full size image

Fifteen studies compared the ONSD between patients with increased ICP and a normal cohort (Fig. 2). The ONSD measured by US was significantly larger among patients with elevated ICP compared to their normal counterparts (5.6 mm vs 4.1 mm, SMD: 2.44 [95% CI 1.93–2.95]).

The present study should be interpreted with several caveats. Despite most studies being prospective in nature, baseline patient characteristics can be heterogeneous such as the etiology of increased ICP and clinical settings where US-ONSD measurement was taken place. Subgroup analyses were performed and showed variations in terms of the pooled value in each condition. Nonetheless, the majority of studies were reported ONSD among a mixed population. Future study should report outcomes stratified based on these variables to determine the mean value for elevated ICP in each clinical scenario. Further, the present meta-analysis did not analyze the sensitivity and specificity of the pooled US-ONSD value. Such analysis requires each individual study reporting sensitivity and specificity in the original article, but the criteria of US-ONSD for elevated ICP vary among different authors. A number of studies for the ONSD evaluation used the median values rather than the mean value. Although in our analysis we used all the values relevant in the literature to obtained mean values, this could be a potential confounder when trying to establish an accurate value. ONSD values are usually represented as the average of measurements between the eyes. Normally, three measures for each eye are taken and then averaged. However, some studies used only two measures per eye, and some others used one transverse measurement and one on vertical plane per eye (averaged). Furthermore, some studies have suggested an "internal" ONSD (ONSDi) and an "external" ONSD (ONSDe). The two measurements can differ. These factors can produce differences of measurements and potential bias may be created.

Even if there are several limitations about the use of a unique cut-off value of ONSD for detecting elevated ICP, this update may help to clarify which is the value that could be considered as marker of intracranial hypertension.

Thus, the aim of the present study was to pool the US-ONSD using available studies to determine a mean value that can be used as a reference for future study to determine its specificity and sensitivity in real-world clinical practice.

Conclusions

Based on available evidence, the mean value of the ONSD among patients diagnosed with increased ICP was 5.82 mm (95% CI 5.58–6.06 mm). Variations were observed based on etiology of intracranial hypertension, clinical settings where ONSD was measured, and standards for diagnosing intracranial hypertension. The US-ONSD among patients with elevated ICP was significantly higher than the normal control. Although a cut-off value is not clearly determined these mean values can be implemented to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of US-ONSD in diagnosing intracranial hypertension in future studies. Larger, stratified, prospective studies are warranted to determine its value in each clinical setting.

Availability of data and materials

All data are available from the authors upon request.

References

  1. Canac N, Jalaleddini K, Thorpe SG, Thibeault CM, Hamilton RB (2020) pathophysiology of intracranial hypertension and noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring. Fluids Barriers CNS 17(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Farahvar A, Gerber LM, Chiu Y-L, Carney N, Härtl R, Ghajar J (2012) Increased mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury treated without intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurosurg 117(4):729–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Han J, Yang S, Zhang C, Zhao M, Li A (2016) Impact of intracranial pressure monitoring on prognosis of patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 95:7

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tavakoli S, Peitz G, Ares W, Hafeez S, Grandhi R (2017) Complications of invasive intracranial pressure monitoring devices in neurocritical care. Neurosurg Focus 43(5):E6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kayhanian S, Young AM, Piper RJ et al (2018) Radiological correlates of raised intracranial pressure in children: a review. Front Pediatr 6:32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dubourg J, Javouhey E, Geeraerts T, Messerer M, Kassai B (2011) Ultrasonography of optic nerve sheath diameter for detection of raised intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intens Care Med 37(7):1059–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Montorfano L, Giambartolomei G, Funes DR, Lo Menzo E, Dip F, White KP, Rosenthal RJ (2020) The Cushing reflex and the vasopressin-mediated hemodynamic response to increased intracranial pressure during acute elevations in intraabdominal pressure. Surgery 167(2):478–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M et al (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Control Found Appl 4(1):1

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aduayi OS, Asaleye CM, Adetiloye VA, Komolafe EO, Aduayi VA (2015) Optic nerve sonography: a noninvasive means of detecting raised intracranial pressure in a resource-limited setting. J Neurosci Rural Pract 6(4):563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Altayar AS, Abouelela AZ, Abdelshafey EE et al (2020) Optic nerve sheath diameter by ultrasound is a good screening tool for high intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury. Irish J Med Sci 8:254

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bhandari D, Udupi Bidkar P, Adinarayanan S, Narmadhalakshmi K, Srinivasan S (2019) Measurement of changes in optic nerve sheath diameter using ultrasound and computed tomography scan before and after the ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery in patients with hydrocephalus-A prospective observational trial. Br J Neurosurg 33(2):125–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Blaivas M, Theodoro D, Sierzenski PR (2003) Elevated intracranial pressure detected by bedside emergency ultrasonography of the optic nerve sheath. Acad Emerg Med 10(4):376–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bäuerle J, Nedelmann M (2011) Sonographic assessment of the optic nerve sheath in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neurol 258(11):2014–2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen LM, Wang LJ, Shi L, Chen HX, Jiang XH, Chen QQ, Xing YQ (2019) Reliability of assessing non-severe elevation of intracranial pressure using optic nerve sheath diameter and transcranial Doppler parameters. Front Neurol 22(10):1091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. del Saz-Saucedo P, Redondo-González O, Mateu-Mateu Á, Huertas-Arroyo R, García-Ruiz R, Botia-Paniagua E (2016) Sonographic assessment of the optic nerve sheath diameter in the diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neurol Sci 361:122–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Du J, Deng Y, Li H et al (2020) Ratio of optic nerve sheath diameter to eyeball transverse diameter by ultrasound can predict intracranial hypertension in traumatic brain injury patients: a prospective study. Neurocrit Care 32(2):478–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Geeraerts T, Launey Y, Martin L et al (2007) Ultrasonography of the optic nerve sheath may be useful for detecting raised intracranial pressure after severe brain injury. Intensive Care Med 33(10):1704–1711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Goel RS, Goyal NK, Dharap SB, Kumar M, Gore MA (2008) Utility of optic nerve ultrasonography in head injury. Injury 39(5):519–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hanafi MG, Verki MM, Parei SN (2019) Ultrasonic assessment of optic nerve sheath to detect increased intracranial pressure. J Med Ultrasound 27(2):69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kimberly HH, Shah S, Marill K, Noble V (2008) Correlation of optic nerve sheath diameter with direct measurement of intracranial pressure. Acad Emerg Med 15(2):201–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Komut E, Kozaci N, Sönmez BM, et al. Bedside sonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter as a predictor of intracranial pressure in ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(6):963–7. 

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mohson KI, Auday N (2019) Role of orbital ultrasound in the assessment of clinically detected papilledema. J Med Ultrasound 27(3):135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Moretti R, Pizzi B (2009) Optic nerve ultrasound for detection of intracranial hypertension in intracranial hemorrhage patients: confirmation of previous findings in a different patient population. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 21(1):16–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nash JE, O’Rourke C, Moorman ML (2016) Transocular ultrasound measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter can identify elevated intracranial pressure in trauma patients. Trauma 18(1):28–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rehman H, Khan MS, Nafees M, Rehman AU, Habib A (2016) Optic nerve sheath diameter on sonography in idiopathic intracranial hypertension versus normal. JCPSP 26(9):758–760

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shirodkar CG, Rao SM, Mutkule DP, Harde YR, Venkategowda PM, Mahesh MU (2014) Optic nerve sheath diameter as a marker for evaluation and prognostication of intracranial pressure in Indian patients: an observational study. Ind J Critic Care Med 18(11):728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tarzamni MK, Derakhshan B, Meshkini A et al (2016) The diagnostic performance of ultrasonographic optic nerve sheath diameter and color Doppler indices of the ophthalmic arteries in detecting elevated intracranial pressure. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 141:82–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ussahgij W, Toonpirom W, Munkong W, Lenghong K, Apiratwarakul K (2020) Optic nerve sheath diameter cutoff point for detection of increased intracranial pressure in the emergency department. J Med Sci 8:62–65

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wang L, Feng L, Yao Y, Wang Y, Chen Y, Feng J, Xing Y (2015) Optimal optic nerve sheath diameter threshold for the identification of elevated opening pressure on lumbar puncture in a Chinese population. PLoS ONE 10(2):e0117939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zoerle T, Caccioppola A, D’Angelo E et al (2020) Optic nerve sheath diameter is not related to intracranial pressure in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients. Neurocritic Care. 14:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  31. Liao SF, Chen PJ, Chaou CH, Lee CH (2018) Top-cited publications on point-of-care ultrasound: The evolution of research trends. Am J Emerg Med 36(8):1429–1438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kendall JL, Hoffenberg SR, Smith RS (2007) History of emergency and critical care ultrasound: the evolution of a new imaging paradigm. Crit Care Med 35(5 Suppl):S126–S130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Carson PL, Fenster A (2009) Anniversary paper: evolution of ultrasound physics and the role of medical physicists and the AAPM and its journal in that evolution. Med Phys 36(2):411–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Montoya J, Stawicki SP, Evans DC, Bahner DP, Sparks S, Sharpe RP, Cipolla J (2016) From FAST to E-FAST: an overview of the evolution of ultrasound-based traumatic injury assessment. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 42(2):119–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Cosgrove DO (2017) Evolution of ultrasonography since the 1970s. Ultrasound Med Biol 43(11):2741–2742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.06.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Goldberg BB, Gramiak R, Freimanis AK (1993) Early history of diagnostic ultrasound: the role of American radiologists. Am J Roentgenol 160(1):189–194. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.160.1.8416623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Newman PG, Rozycki GS (1998) The history of ultrasound. Surg Clin North Am 78(2):179–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-6109(05)70308-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Nag DS, Sahu S, Swain A, Kant S (2019) Intracranial pressure monitoring: gold standard and recent innovations. World J Clin Cases 7(13):1535–1553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Geeraerts T, Newcombe VF, Coles JP et al (2008) Use of T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the optic nerve sheath to detect raised intracranial pressure. Crit Care 12(5):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Abdelrahman AS, Barakat MM (2020) MRI measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter using 3D driven equilibrium sequence as a non-invasive tool for the diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Egypt J Radiol Nuclear Med 51(1):24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Brain TF (2007) Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. X. Brain oxygen monitoring and thresholds. J Neurotrauma 24:S65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Friedman DI, Jacobson DM (2002) Diagnostic criteria for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Neurology 59(10):1492–1495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rigi M, Almarzouqi SJ, Morgan ML, Lee AG (2015) Papilledema: epidemiology, etiology, and clinical management. Eye and brain 7:47

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was obtained for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd, Weston, FL, USA

    Lisandro Montorfano, Qian Yu, Stephen J. Bordes & Raul J. Rosenthal

  2. School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington D.C, USA

    Shankarapryan Sivanushanthan

  3. Department of Ultrasound and Vascular Doppler, Hospital de Emergencias “Dr. Clemente Alvarez”, Av. Pellegrini 3205, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina

    Miguel Montorfano

Authors
  1. Lisandro Montorfano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qian Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stephen J. Bordes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shankarapryan Sivanushanthan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Raul J. Rosenthal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Miguel Montorfano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LM: manuscript writing, review and final edition. QY: data collection and analysis. SJB: manuscript writing and edition. SS: Data analysis. RJR: manuscript edition. MM: main hypothesis, manuscript final review and edition, advisory input. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel Montorfano.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors consent for publication. All authors of the manuscript have read and agreed to its content.

The manuscript is original, has not already been published, and is not currently under consideration by another journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Montorfano, L., Yu, Q., Bordes, S.J. et al. Mean value of B-mode optic nerve sheath diameter as an indicator of increased intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound J 13, 35 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-021-00235-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-021-00235-5

Keywords