Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Case report
  • Open Access

Point-of-care ultrasound diagnosis of stump appendicitis in the emergency department

The Ultrasound Journal201911:12

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-019-0128-5

  • Received: 5 February 2019
  • Accepted: 3 June 2019
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Stump appendicitis (SA) is a rare entity in patients with a history of appendectomy and may result in missed or delayed diagnosis. We report a case of SA diagnosed by emergency department (ED) point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) in an elderly woman, thus expediting her care.

Case presentation

An elderly female patient with a history of appendectomy 27 years ago was referred by her physician to the ED with right lower quadrant pain for 2 days. Using PoCUS the emergency physician identified SA. This was confirmed by computed tomography (CT) scan. The patient was then successfully managed non-operatively using antibiotics.

Conclusions

Despite its rarity, it is feasible to diagnose SA using PoCUS, as patients presenting with right lower quadrant pain and history of appendectomy are at risk for delayed diagnosis, perforation, and poor outcome. PoCUS may reduce time to diagnosis, time to definitive operative or non-operative management, and minimize morbidity.

Background

Stump appendicitis (SA) is a rare long-term complication of appendectomy. It is defined as the interval development of inflammation of the remaining appendix after an appendectomy [1]. The signs and symptoms are the same as acute appendicitis, thus making the diagnosis difficult. History of past appendectomy often leads to delayed or missed diagnosis that can cause morbidity. Perforation rate of SA reportedly ranges from 40 to 70% [1, 2].

SA was first described by Rose in 1945 [3], with a reported incidence of 1 in 50,000 cases [1]. However, the exact prevalence is not known [4] and likely under-reported as it may imply inadequate surgical technique [5]. Buttrick et al. [6] conducted a 5-year case review of 3252 appendectomies at our institution, which revealed only two cases of SA yielding a prevalence of approximately 0.06%. In a 60-year review by Subramanian and Liang, patients presented a mean of 108 ± 20 months after initial appendectomy [5]. It was unclear if there were specific high-risk features for the development of SA [5]. However, they noted in their review that SA occurred after both open and laparoscopic appendectomies. Additionally, they noted that the mean length of the residual stump was 3.3 cm (range 0.5–6.5 cm) with no patient reported to have SA with residual stump < 0.5 cm [5]. The most common presenting symptom was abdominal pain (93%) with 77% of patients having right lower quadrant pain [5]. Fifty-seven percent of patients presented with gastrointestinal symptoms, including nausea and vomiting [5]. The differential diagnoses of right lower quadrant abdominal pain in patients with history of appendectomy are listed in Table 1 [4].
Table 1

Differential diagnosis of right lower quadrant pain after appendectomy

Meckel’s diverticulitis

Psoas abscess

Cecal diverticulitis

Cholecystitis

Regional enteritis

PID

Leaking aneurysm

Torsion of ovarian cyst

Abdominal wall hematoma

Mittelschmerz

Ureteral stone

Endometriosis

Seminal vesiculitis

Mesenteric adenitis

Prostatitis

Right lower lobe pneumonia

Acute testicular disease

Appendiceal stump abscess

We report the first case of SA identified by point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) and was successfully managed non-operatively.

Case report

A 69-year-old female was referred to the emergency department (ED) by her primary care physician with right lower quadrant abdominal pain for 2 days. She had nausea but no vomiting, fever, or diarrhea. She reported a history of appendectomy 27 years ago. Her past medical history included rheumatic heart disease with prolapsed mitral valve and hypothyroidism.

Physical examination revealed a temperature of 35.8 °C (96.4 °F), with otherwise stable vital signs. She had appendectomy scar and tenderness in the right lower quadrant without guarding or rebound tenderness. Her white blood cell count was 7.4 × 109/L with neutrophils 62.5%.

PoCUS demonstrated a non-compressible blind-ended tubular structure measuring 9.4 mm in diameter (Fig. 1a) connecting to cecum, surrounding with small amount of free fluid and fat stranding (Fig. 1b). Subsequent computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen and pelvis confirmed these findings (Fig. 2). Video link: https://youtu.be/BH5VrGYcfYc.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

a Transverse (short axis) ultrasound scan shows SA measuring 9.4 mm in diameter. b Longitudinal ultrasound scan shows tubular blind-ended structure with surrounding with free fluid

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

CT scan shows thickening and inflammatory change of a tubular structure extending from the base of the cecum, surrounding with inflammatory change

The patient was admitted and administered intravenous piperacillin–tazobactam. Given her history of rheumatic heart disease, non-operative management was chosen. One day after admission, her clinical examination significantly improved with no peritoneal signs. She was discharged with a 10-day course of oral levaquin and metronidazole. She had a follow-up CT scan 2 months later which was unremarkable.

Procedure/technique

In patients who have localized right lower quadrant pain with high clinical suspicion for appendicitis, we recommend scanning the area of maximal tenderness and/or pain using a high-frequency (10–15 MHz) linear transducer. If the appendix is visualized, we try to identify the entire length of the appendix (abnormal cutoff diameter > 6 mm) from tip to base entering the cecum. We demonstrate the appendix in perpendicular orthogonal views (short and long axes). If the pain is non-localizing or more diffuse, we recommend starting at McBurney’s point, visualizing the right psoas muscle, identifying a loop of ileum, and then following it to the ileocecal valve and cecum which is often adjacent to the appendix. An enlarged appendix with abnormal cutoff diameter > 6 mm suggests SA. Additionally, compressibility of the SA relative to adjacent bowel is assessed by graded compression [7] or sonopalpation with the ultrasound transducer [8, 9].

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first report of SA diagnosed with ED PoCUS. Before the advent of CT scan, definitive preoperative diagnosis of SA was not possible [10]. While CT scan may also diagnose other causes of abdominal pain (Table 1), it may prolong ED length-of-stay [8] and may not be available in low-resource settings. Since Puylaert et al. first described the graded compression technique for diagnosing appendicitis in 1986 [7], radiologist-performed ultrasound for SA, but not PoCUS, has been reported in the literature [5] as having the same as acute appendicitis. Published literature shows that PoCUS by emergency physicians has high specificity (97%) [11] and positive predictive value (91%) [11] to rule-in appendicitis [8, 1113]. PoCUS can decrease ED length-of-stay compared to radiologist-performed ultrasound and CT scan, avoids radiation [8], and may be performed serially in non-operative management. One literature review of 51 reported cases of SA indicated that radiologist-performed ultrasound may well have a high accuracy in establishing the diagnosis of SA as it does for acute appendicitis, but no studies on sensitivity and specificity for SA have been published [14]. Nevertheless, the choice between ultrasound and CT in this clinical setting is largely dependent on institutional preference and available expertise [5, 14, 15].

A treatment of choice for SA is completion appendectomy either by open or laparoscopic intervention [6, 16]. There is one reported SA case that was successfully treated with non-operative treatment [2] as was our case. However, Hendahewa et al. reported a case of SA which was managed operatively initially, but developed recurrent SA again 3 years later, and subsequently underwent laparoscopic appendectomy [17]. Non-operative management for SA may be suitable for some patients, especially in those patients having multiple comorbidities or at risk for poor outcomes during surgery. Close follow-up in these patients is warranted, as concern for recurrent SA may approach recurrence rates in non-operatively managed appendicitis.

Conclusion

Despite its rarity, it is feasible to diagnose SA using PoCUS, as patients presenting with right lower quadrant pain and history of appendectomy are at risk for delayed diagnosis, perforation, and poor outcome. PoCUS may reduce time to diagnosis, time to definitive operative or non-operative management, and minimize morbidity.

Abbreviations

SA: 

stump appendicitis

ED: 

emergency department

CT: 

computed tomography

Declarations

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Authors’ contributions

AM performed the point-of-care ultrasound and acquired the images, conceptualized the case report, drafted the initial manuscript, and approved the final manuscript for publication. BPN and PA provided supervision, reviewed and revised the manuscript for critically important intellectual content, and approved the final manuscript for publication. JWT provided supervision and technical support, revised the manuscript for critically important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Consent for publication

Informed consent was obtained from patient who agreed to the publication of images.

Competing interests

Dr. Nelson has consulted for Simulab Corp. Dr. Tsung was an educational consultant to G.E. Healthcare Point-of-care Ultrasound Division in 2017. Drs. Monsomboon and Andrus have no financial relationships or competing interest to report.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Emergency Ultrasound, Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
(2)
Present address: Department of Emergency Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

References

  1. Liang MK, Lo HG, Marks JL (2006) Stump appendicitis: a comprehensive review of literature. Am Surg 72:162–166PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Leff DR, Sait MR, Hanief M, Salakianathan S, Darzi AW, Vashisht R (2012) Inflammation of the residual appendix stump: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 14:282–293View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Rose TF (1945) Recurrent appendiceal abscess. Med J Aust 1(26):659–662Google Scholar
  4. Harris CR (1989) Appendiceal stump abscess ten years after appendectomy. Am J Emerg Med 7:411–412View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Subramanian A, Liang MK (2012) A 60-year literature review of stump appendicitis: the need for a critical view. Am J Surg 203(4):503–507View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Buttrick SS, Choi JJ, Divino CM (2012) Stump appendicitis after open and laparoscopic appendectomies. Am Surg 78:143–144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Puylaert JB (1986) Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology 158:355–360View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Elikashvili I, Tay ET, Tsung JW (2014) The effect of point-of-care ultrasonography on emergency department length of stay and computed tomography utilization in children with suspected appendicitis. Acad Emerg Med 21:163–170View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Faust JS, Tsung JW (2017) Eliciting renal tenderness by sonopalpation in diagnosing acute pyelonephritis. Crit Ultrasound J 9(1):1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Rao PM, Sagarin MJ, McCabe CJ (1998) Stump appendicitis diagnosed preoperatively by computed tomography. Am J Emerg Med 16:309–311View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Fields JM, Davis J, Alsup C et al (2017) Accuracy of point-of-care ultrasonography for diagnosing acute appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med 24(9):1124–1136View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Fox JC, Solley M, Anderson CL, Zlidenny A, Lahham S, Maasumi K (2008) Prospective evaluation of emergency physician performed bedside ultrasound to detect acute appendicitis. Eur J Emerg Med 15:80–85View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Mallin M, Craven P, Ockerse P (2015) Diagnosis of appendicitis by bedside ultrasound in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 33:430–432View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Kanona H, Al Samaraee A, Nice C, Bhattacharya V (2012) Stump appendicitis: a review. Int J Surg 10:425–428View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Kosaka N, Sagoh T, Uematsu H, Kimura H, Yamamori S, Miyayama S et al (2007) Difficulties in the diagnosis of appendicitis: review of CT and US images. Emerg Radiol 14:289–295View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Martínez Chamorro E, Merina Castilla A, Muñoz Fraile B, Koren Fernández L, Borruel Nacenta S (2013) Stump appendicitis: preoperative imaging findings in four cases. Abdom Imaging 38:1214–1219View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Hendahewa R, Shekhar A, Ratnayake S (2015) The dilemma of stump appendicitis—a case report and literature review. Int J Surg Case Rep 14:101–103View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2019

Advertisement