- Letter to the Editor
- Open Access
Is it best to reFOCUS on basic echocardiography in the emergency department?
Critical Ultrasound Journalvolume 10, Article number: 21 (2018)
The original article was published in Critical Ultrasound Journal 2018 10:10
The Letter to the Editor to this article has been published in Critical Ultrasound Journal 2018 10:20
We read the article of Betcher et al.  regarding the feasibility of measuring stroke volume and diastolic function parameters with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in the emergency department (ED). While this is clearly stated as a feasibility study, we are honestly questioning the real utility of taking all these measurements, since nearly all patients can be managed without this information on the trenches, reasoning basic echo findings in context with the history and physician examination, without the need of adding complexity, spending extra time, or exposing patients to technique errors or interpretation mistakes. Mentors and trainees must understand (and thus focus on setting the bases of training accordingly) that a well-performed basic echocardiogram (with the addition of the information provided by lung ultrasound, which provides valuable data when showing the mere presence of B lines and/or pleural effusions, answering a simple clinical question in terms of “wet” vs. “dry” lungs ) is most of the times enough, and that taking measurements is obviously valid but rarely needed. And when needed, they must be clearly indicated and should be performed by experienced and well-trained practitioners. In this regard, as shown in pulsed-wave Doppler figures, corresponding to Figs. 2 and 3 of the original article (Fig. 1), an angle correction is observed, a practice that is formally not recommended in echocardiography (the angle used should be 0) . This intuitively raises questions about the level of training of the operators in this study as well as of the supervising physicians who consider that exams like these are valid. In addition, all these measurements have inherent limitations, such as LVOT obstruction, a significant aortic regurgitation for LVOT VTI , or simply tachycardia for transmitral flow/annulus velocities estimations. In addition, measurement of the diameter of the LVOT to calculate the LVOT area can be readily omitted in practice (avoiding errors derived from the squared nature of the formula), and just using the LVOT VTI to infer the SV and the cardiac output and its variations with treatments . We also honestly have deep doubts regarding whether a 20-min didactic training, practicing in a standardized model or a 1-month point rotation is enough to take these advanced measurements when most real practitioners spend months (or even years) trying to do these accurately. Results of this study are not surprising by considering the aspects expressed above.
In conclusion, in our humble view, we consider that taking measurements may be useless in the ED and that we need to maintain the focus on training and practice moving the needle in favor of basic TTE over advanced TTE. Prioritizing the basic aspects of TTE and lung US is most (if not all) of the times enough in EDs (“visual diagnosis”), and it is better to postpone measurements until they can be performed in a more controlled setting, such as the intensive care unit. Of course, this does not mean that ED practitioners should never perform measurements; of course, they can, but with the requirement of having an excellent level of training, an aspect that requires long months, and even years.
Betcher J, Al Majkrzak A, Cranford J, Kessler R, Theyyunni N, Huang R (2018) Feasibility study of advanced focused cardiac measurements within the emergency department. Crit Ultrasound J 10:10
Blanco P (2017) Lung ultrasound and echocardiography: a useful duet. Med Intensiva 41(3):197
Quiñones MA, Otto CM, Stoddard M, Waggoner A, Zoghbi WA, Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography (2002) Recommendations for quantification of Doppler echocardiography: a report from the Doppler Quantification Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 15(2):167–184
Blanco P, Aguiar FM, Blaivas M (2015) Rapid ultrasound in shock (RUSH) velocity-time integral: a proposal to expand the RUSH protocol. J Ultrasound Med 34(9):1691–1700
PB (primary author) and GB involved in drafting, reviewing, preparing, and editing the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors would like to thank Mrs. Julieta Vigna for the language guidance.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Availability of data and materials
Consent for publication
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This article received no funding or grants.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.