From: Unravelling the skillset of point-of-care ultrasound: a systematic review
Domain | Articles | Tests used | Sample size (total) | Pooled correlation [95% CI] | Determination coefficient |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge | k = 13 n = 716 | 0.51 [0.35; 0.63] p < 0.0001 | 0.26 | ||
Image interpretation | Bell et al. [33], Chung et al. [35], Janjigian et al. [36], Kissin et al. [37], Nielsen et al. [38], Schott et al. [39], Sisley et al. [42], Stolz et al. [41], Woodworth et al. [43] | Different multiple choice and written tests | k = 9 n = 466 | 0.58 [0.43; 0.70] p < 0.0001 | 0.34 |
Technical aspects | Janjigian et al. [31], Nielsen et al. [33], Schott et al. [34], Sisley et al. [44], Stolz et al. [45] Werner et al. [46] | Different multiple choice and written tests | k = 6 n = 309 | 0.47 [0.20; 0.67] p = 0.0013 | 0.22 |
General cognitive ability | Berman et al. [34], Carrigan et al. [44], Shafqat et al. [47] | Kit of Factor Reference Cognitive tests, EXPERTise 2.0 Echocardiography edition, Alice Heim Group Ability Test, Numerical Reasoning Test, Digit Symbol Substitution Test | k = 2 n = 149 | 0.21 [− 0.09; 0.47] p = 0.1741 | 0.04 |
Psychomotor ability | |||||
Psychomotor ability | Chapman et al. [45], Dromey et al. [46], Smith et al. [48], Walker et al. [49] | Crawford small parts dexterity test, Dimensionless Squared Jerk, Project image test (ZigZag test), Purdue Pegboard test, Semmes–Weinstein Monofilament Sensory Test | k = 4 n = 120 | No correlation reported | |
Visuospatial ability | k = 8 n = 708 | 0.39 [0.23; 0.54] p < 0.0001 | 0.16 | ||
Visuospatial manipulation | k = 7 n = 668 | 0.37 [0.17; 0.54] p = 0.0005 | 0.14 | ||
Visualization | Berman et al. [34], Clem et al. [51], Clem et al. [46], Chapman et al. [45] | Kit of Factor Reference Cognitive Tests (spatial orientation and visualization subtests), Revised Minnesota Paper Form Board Test, Surface Development Test | k = 3 n = 179 | 0.39 [0.09; 0.63] p = 0.0116 | 0.15 |
Mental rotation | Chapman et al. [45], Chuan et al. [52], Duce et al. [53], Frederiksen et al. [54], Hewson et al. [55], Shafqat et al. [47], Miller et al. [56], Walker et al. [49] | Mental Rotation test, Revised Vanderberg and Kruse Mental Rotation Test A | k = 4 n = 489 | 0.38 [0.0864; 0.61] p = 0.0125 | 0.15 |
Visuospatial perception | k = 3 n = 156 | 0.33 [0.14; 0.49] p = 0.0009 | 0.11 | ||
Lower order perception | Smith et al. [48] | Pelli-Robson contrast acuity testing | k = 1 n = 40 | No correlation reported | |
Closure speed | Block Design Test (WAIS-IV), Gestalt Completion Test, Matrix reasoning Test, The Snowy Picture Test, Visual puzzles | k = 2 n = 73 | 0.43 [0.22; 0.60] p = 0.0002 | 0.19 | |
Flexibility of closure | Berman et al. [34] Chapman et al. [45], Duce et al. [53], Shafqat et al. [47] | Abstract Reasoning Test, Concealed Figures Test, Group Embedded Figures Test, Kit of Factor Reference Cognitive Tests (flexibility of closure subtest) | k = 2 n = 143 | 0.14 [− 0.02; 0.30] p = 0.0839 | 0.02 |
Visual memory | Carrigan et al. [44] | Novel Object Memory Test | k = 1 n = 39 | No correlation reported | |
Spatial scanning | Smith et al. [48] | Trail making test (TMT) | k = 1 n = 40 | No correlation reported |