Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of image acquisition times for workshops 1 and 2 expressed in seconds and presented as median and interquartile ranges [25%; 75%]. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.02)

From: Detecting cervical esophagus with ultrasound on healthy voluntaries: learning curve

Try number

Workshop 1 (n = 32)

Workshop 2 (n = 29)

1

20.4 [10.6;41]

13.8 [8.5;35]

2

19.6 [10.2;33.2]

8.5 [5.5;13.5]

3

8.85 [6.2;21.6]

6 [3.8;10.8]

4

8.05 [5.5;13.5]

4.88 [3.5;7.5]

5

7 [5.3;11.4]

4.9 [3.8;8.7]

6

6.85 [4.25;10.5]

4.6 [3.18;7.6]

7

6.8 [4.22;11.4]

4.8 [3.1;6.6]

8

5.3 [4.15;7.75]

5 [3.6;7.1]

9

5.8 [4.08;10.2]

3.89 [2.76;5.2]

10

5.02 [3.72;7.5]

4.5 [2.93;6.5]