Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparison of different diagnostic strategies incorporating Wells score, d-dimer measurement and LUS in 141 patients with pleuritic chest pain and available data on d-dimer, from Reissig 2001 and Nazerian 2017 studies

From: Retrospective analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound for pulmonary embolism in patients with and without pleuritic chest pain

 

- Wells score ≤ 4

- Negative d-dimer

- Wells score ≤ 4

- Negative LUS

- Wells score ≤ 4

- Negative d-dimer

- Negative LUS

- Wells score ≤ 4

- Negative LUS

(painful area)

Failure rate*

6.7%

(1.9–16.2)

3.7%

(0.8–10.6)

0%

(0–6.5)

4.9%

(1.36–12.2)

Efficiency**

42.5%

(34.3–51.2)

56.7%

(48.1 -65)

39%

(30.9–47.6)

57.4%

(48.8–65.7)

Sensitivity

90.7%

(77.9–97.4)

93%

(80.9–98.5)

100%

(91.8–100)

90.7%

(77.9–97.4)

Specificity

57.1%

(46.7–67.1)

78.6%

(69.1–86.2)

56.1%

(45.7–66-1)

78.6%

(69.1–86.2)

PPV

48.1%

(42–54.3)

65.6%

(55.4–73.7)

50%

(44.4–55.6)

65%

(55.7–73.3)

NPV

93.3%

(84.4–97.3)

96.2%

(89.6–98.7)

100%

95.1%

(88.3–98)

LR + 

2.12

(1.65–2.71)

4.34

(2.95–6.4)

2.28

(1.82–2.85)

4.23

(2.86–6.26)

LR-

0.16

(0.06–0.42)

0.09

(0.03–0.27)

0

0.12

(0.05–0.3)

  1. In brackets the 95% confidence interval
  2. LUS lung ultrasound, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, LR +  positive likelihood ratio, LR- negative likelihood ratio
  3. *Calculated as the number of patients within the group with a final diagnosis of pulmonary embolism divided by all patients in the same group
  4. **Calculated as the number of patients within the group divided by all included patients