Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of knowledge test scores and fulfillment of course objectives by the in-person vs. tele-ultrasound POCUS courses

From: Comparison of in-person versus tele-ultrasound point-of-care ultrasound training during the COVID-19 pandemic

 

In-person (n = 88)

Tele-ultrasound (n = 52)

p-value

Knowledge test scores

 Pre-course (%)

  Mean

71

78

0.001

  Median [IQR]

73 [60–83]

83 [71–85]

 

  Range

34–98

49–95

 

 Post-course (%)

  Mean

87

89

0.069

  Median [IQR]

88 [83–91]

90 [85–93]

 

  Range

49–98

54–100

 

 Differences (%)

  Mean

16

11

0.017

  Median [IQR]

12 [7–22]

7 [2–18]

 

  Range

(− 7)–51

(− 12)–39

 

  p-value

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

 

Fulfillment of course objectivesa

 Fundamental principles of ultrasound technology and basic operation of a portable ultrasound machine

4.7

4.7

0.81

 Techniques to perform focused diagnostic ultrasound examinations at the bedside, including imaging of the heart, lungs, abdomen, and lower extremity veins

4.8

4.8

0.53

 Techniques to guide performance of bedside procedures with ultrasound guidance, including central venous catheterization, thoracentesis, paracentesis, and lumbar puncture

4.5

4.4

0.32

 Indications, basic protocols, and limitations of bedside ultrasound imaging

4.7

4.6

0.65

 Practice interpretation of normal and abnormal ultrasound images

4.7

4.7

0.81

 Mentored scanning with experienced faculty to learn hands-on imaging techniques

4.7

4.7

0.70

  1. aMean scores per 5-point scale (1 = not at all; 2 = minimal; 3 = neutral; 4 = good; 5 = excellent) with p-values calculated for proportion giving an excellent rating