Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 1 Focused cardiac ultrasound efficiency scores for participant groups throughout the 6-month study period

From: Prospective evaluation of cardiac ultrasound performance by general internal medicine physicians during a 6-month faculty development curriculum

Baseline 3 months 6 months
GIM CF p GIM CF p GIM CF p
2.2 (1.0) 3.7 (1.2) 0.69 3.3 (1.0) 4.7 (1.2) 0.77 3.8 (1.0) 4.4 (1.2) 1.00
  1. Data reported as model-adjusted means (SE). Comparisons reported using adjusted p value
  2. GIM general internal medicine faculty, CF cardiology fellows, DCS diagnostic cardiac sonographers, SE standard error
GIM DCS p GIM DCS p GIM DCS p
2.2 (1.0) 11.7 (1.2) < 0.001 3.3 (1.01) 16.0 (1.2) < 0.001 3.8 (1.0) 14.3 (1.2) < 0.001
  1. Data reported as model-adjusted means (SE). Comparisons reported using adjusted p value
  2. GIM general internal medicine faculty, CF cardiology fellows, DCS diagnostic cardiac sonographers, SE standard error
CF DCS p CF DCS p CF DCS p
3.7 (1.2) 11.7 (1.2) < 0.001 4.7 (1.16) 16.0 (1.2) < 0.001 4.4 (1.2) 14.32 (1.2) < 0.001
  1. Data reported as model-adjusted means (SE). Comparisons reported using adjusted p value
  2. GIM general internal medicine faculty, CF cardiology fellows, DCS diagnostic cardiac sonographers, SE standard error